<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPL4J</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maas-frensch.com/peter/2006/11/14/gpl4j/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maas-frensch.com/peter/2006/11/14/gpl4j/</link>
	<description>Peter Maas's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frans Maas</title>
		<link>http://maas-frensch.com/peter/2006/11/14/gpl4j/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Frans Maas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maas-frensch.com/peter/2006/11/14/gpl4j/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>This is a complex puzzle that scares people off.
Must be big times for service providers who are prepared to take the complete license issue out of the hands of their customers.
Of course this comes at a cost, somewhat destroying the business case for open source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a complex puzzle that scares people off.<br />
Must be big times for service providers who are prepared to take the complete license issue out of the hands of their customers.<br />
Of course this comes at a cost, somewhat destroying the business case for open source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
